The election campaign is half-way, but most of the work of "promotion" of candidates has already been done. The effective technique of "home more house" has been widely used by astute, so others do not hear is that motivation, even among other requirements, because most of citizenship has already decided to vote for this doctor, or that responsible health care, or entrepreneur. The reasons for these choices has nothing in common with the city administration or with the election program, and although it contains something unusually funny, give rise to serious reflection.
First, the campaign can be sketched as a kind of hunting in the vote, which is held between the candidate and the electorate-prey. The first "target" of the candidate are the elderly, who are still "the land of conquest" of doctors. This part of the electorate does not hide his choice and even less motivation, which is linked to health reasons. We would object to them "and how do we improve the future for decades if the same rated doctor?" But then you look at them and realize that they have an idea of \u200b\u200bthe very near future and then you know it's useless to try to convince them.
Then there are the parents of children of working age but unemployed and, of course, the unemployed (including the workers to look black). This kind of voters are "prey" favorite public administrations and private entrepreneurs (including those responsible for pseudo-co-op), for which the campaign is a series of promises of jobs to permanent and temporary, continuing a young system in the world of work. Some young people, especially if it has had a large family, is already working on the campaign trail, too bad that after the election ends also work.
Another slice of the electorate, those who have retired relatively young (who have no health problems) and laborers, and conquered the trade union offices linked to the agricultural world, the so-called "charitable" and where, as they say my neighbors, 'they make the cards "that, for those unfamiliar with our dialect, could suggest to agencies witches.
But more puzzling that I have heard in this campaign is that of an acquaintance of mine, whose virile machismo explained to me that he decided to vote for a particular candidate because he gave a hand to his mistress to work (It's love affair) in a cooperative.
women voters deserve special mention that unlike the males did not elaborate on unnecessary explanations, so, even if in a hurry, you listen, take the "saint" and go away, leaving behind an air of mystery.
There would then educated young people, but if these are not children of wealthy professionals, and therefore already politically oriented, no longer live in Latimer.
talk about my campaign, in this frame almost comical but real enables me to make reflections on the serious consequences that this implies a behavior of the electorate. It is clear that the electoral programs - before the reality reported - are paper, and in any event or special skills in the administration of public affairs and daily commitment or commitment to reporting deficiencies or failures are evidence that the mass electoral considered. Latimer - say voters / ici-and candidate needs a change, but according to suscritte signs, as well as a well-known intellectual latianese said, " I do not see anything new on the horizon .
0 comments:
Post a Comment