How Much A Platypus Sells For

WOMENOMICS: "Economy" is a feminine noun

In the current economic downturn, scientists and researchers are wondering if the economy failed to appreciate the resources that now would be necessary for recovery. In this direction has moved the Japanese researcher Kathy Matsui, Goldman Sachs analyst (one of the largest investment banks of the way), which gave rise to a revolutionary view reproduced in the book " womenomics ".

Revolution by Kathy Matsui is that greater integration and exploitation of women not only responds to the principles of fairness, but also meets the criteria of economic efficiency. In other words, more women in the workplace produce economic development. This discovery should make us optimistic about the economic uncertainty the future, but the position of women, especially in our country does not cross a happy time. Indeed, according to ISTAT data for 2009, female participation in Italy is decreasing and more and more are women, especially in the South, who, discouraged, they stop looking for work. Another

given demeaning to the female gender is the effect of insecurity on women is at least double that of males. All this is a possible answer in the fact that Italian women are not represented politically, less represented at the top of institutions and careers than other countries.

is opposed to all this but the fact that rates of female education are more higher than those for men, and that the curricula of women are better than their male colleagues. So it is clear that we have human capital, plus highly qualified, that is not properly used.

Matsui back in search of it turns out that the working groups 'mixed' are more productive than groups of only males or females. Then why are all around us most of the institutions, executive committees of boards of directors should continue to be formed by men, while in the world institutions such as Grameen Bank decided to lift the economies of India and Bangladesh making loans only to women?

It is time that our society is clearly male-to review their schedules and allow women an equal participation, and ask not only democratic principles, yet the economy upon which the lives of us all.